Let me step fully the layer of
superstructure: Fictional world, a layer where understanding taking its place.
In the very beginning of critical theory class, the question being asked
continuously is,” what is the use of literary studies? What is the function of
discussing the fictional novel in this very world? Where is humanist place
within the society?” All the questions suddenly came forth when I was trying to
understand the issue related with Nation
and Empire.
If the economy subjects being concerned
in my previous post, the understanding on nation and empire will take my time
during the history class. National pride as the crucial element in building the
nation may appear when the people recall the past. It is parallel with the
issue I judge as the ridicule one within the society. It was written in my
textbook that the problem that usually occurs after the colonialism or after
the independence day was drowning in all the mighty the people had ever had in
the past: drowning in the past discourse. Thus, Said’s argument points out that
if the exceptionalism is the base of the nationhood as well as colonialism,
then the post-colonialism empire will only become a rerun of the previous
colonialism by the difference of the hero and the villain.
What I understand now from those recall
of the past, the recall of my history class literary, and Said’s arguments
about the worldly text is the understanding of the questions on being an
English Department student, on learning literary studies. By studying fictional
novel, fictional works, I expect to learn how to filter the “make sense” plot,
to indicate the logic sequences, to realize the odd within the story, and the
character, then finally identify how all those effect being produced. Only by
doing these processes we would realize the myths that have been integrated
within our society that own the huge political, economical, and biological
risk. Moreover we should be able to overcome, to resist, this myth by learning
literary studies: by doing demythification. Literary studies help each of the
students become immune to ignorance. As the contrary, we, as the scholars, will
be able to, as Pary says, “show[s]
[more] suspicion about the craft of representation” and structure the massive
superstructure within the full consideration of its base.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar